State v. Anderson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Anderson. Read the opinion of the Court — 407 S.C. 278
Court of Appeals of South Carolina·Decided May 30, 2012·No. 2012-UP-327·Unpublished

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

 Randy Edward Anderson, Appellant.


Appeal From Darlington County
William H. Seals Jr., Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No.  2012-UP-327
Submitted May 1, 2012 – Filed May 30, 2012 


APPEAL DISMISSED


Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Randy Edward Anderson appeals his probation revocation, arguing the circuit court erred in failing to hold an accounting hearing before requiring Appellant to pay a civil judgment.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Anderson, (S.C. Ct. App. 2012).

State v. Anderson (State v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
State v. Williams
406 S.E.2d 357 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1991)