State v. Allen

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Allen

405 S.W.3d 640, 2013 WL 4080916, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 924

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Allen. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1653 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 13, 2013·No. No. ED 98110·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carmel Allen (Defendant) appeals the trial court’s judgment entered after a jury convicted him of forcible rape.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carmel Allen (Defendant) appeals the trial court’s judgment entered after a jury convicted him of forcible rape.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Allen, 405 S.W.3d 640, 2013 WL 4080916, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 924 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

405 S.W.3d 640 (State v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.