State v. Allen

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Allen

471 S.W.3d 396, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 983, 2015 WL 5714807

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 29, 2015·No. WD 77798·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Alen appeals his convictions for tampering in the first degree, section 569.080, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2013, and resisting arrest, section 575.150, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2013, and concurrent sentences of ten years and five years imprisonment, respectively. He contends that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion to sever the count of resisting arrest from the counts of burglary and tampering. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment of convictions is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Alen appeals his convictions for tampering in the first degree, section 569.080, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2013, and resisting arrest, section 575.150, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2013, and concurrent sentences of ten years and five years imprisonment, respectively. He contends that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion to sever the count of resisting arrest from the counts of burglary and tampering. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment of convictions is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Allen, 471 S.W.3d 396, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 983, 2015 WL 5714807 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

471 S.W.3d 396 (State v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related