State v. Agnello
This text of 2003 WI 44 (State v. Agnello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
¶ 1. The court is equally divided on whether to affirm or reverse the judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County. Justice William A. Bablitch, Justice Jon E Wilcox, and Justice N. Patrick Crooks would affirm. Chief Justice Shirley S. Abraha-mson, Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, and Justice David T. Prosser would reverse. Justice Diane S. Sykes did not participate.
¶ 2. When a certification or bypass results in a tie vote by this court, the better course of action is to vacate our decision to accept certification or bypass and remand the cause to the court of appeals. State v. Watson, 209 Wis. 2d 281, 562 N.W.2d 151 (1997) (remanding to court of appeals on a tie vote on certification); State v. Richard Knutson, Inc., 191 Wis. 2d 395, 396-97, 528 N.W.2d 430 (1995).
¶ 3. Accordingly, we vacate our order granting certification and remand to the court of appeals.
By the Court. — The Order granting certification is vacated and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2003 WI 44, 664 N.W.2d 55, 261 Wis. 2d 331, 2003 Wisc. LEXIS 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-agnello-wis-2003.