State v. AFSCME, Council 4, Local 1565

719 A.2d 1167, 246 Conn. 903, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 324
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided July 23, 1998·No. SC 15974·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

The petition of the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 49 Conn. App. 33 (AC 16958), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude, under the circumstances of this case, that when an arbitration award is vacated for lack of mutuality, finality and definiteness, under General Statutes § 52-418 (a) (4), the matter may be referred back to the original arbitrator for the rendering of a definite award, without the necessity of additional evidence, rather than being referred to a new arbitrator for a new hearing?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. AFSCME, Council 4, Local 1565, 719 A.2d 1167, 246 Conn. 903, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 324 (Colo. 1998).

719 A.2d 1167 (State v. AFSCME, Council 4, Local 1565) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cotto v. United Technologies Corp.
738 A.2d 623 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1999)
State v. AFSCME, Council 4, Local 1565
732 A.2d 762 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1999)
Simard v. Salinas, No. Cv 99 0493042s (May 18, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 6036 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
Maiolo Real Est. Inv. v. Town of Somers, No. Cv 97 64143 S (May 18, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 5480 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)
Mireles v. Texas Department of Public Safety
993 S.W.2d 426 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)