Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/State v. AEM

State v. AEM

297 S.W.3d 151, 2009 WL 4035556
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 24, 2009·No. WD 70770·Published

Opinion

297 S.W.3d 151 (2009)

STATE of Missouri, Appellant,
v.
A.E.M., Respondent.

No. WD 70770.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

November 24, 2009.

Steven M. Kretzer, for Appellant.

Melinda K. Pendergraph, for Respondent.

Before Division Two: VICTOR C. HOWARD, Presiding Judge, JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge and MARK D. PFEIFFER, Judge.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

The State of Missouri appeals from the trial court's order granting a motion to suppress the results of a blood alcohol test administered to A.E.M. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that sufficient evidence exists to support the trial court's order of suppression and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. A memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. AEM, 297 S.W.3d 151, 2009 WL 4035556 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

297 S.W.3d 151 (State v. AEM) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.