State v. A.E.M.

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. A.E.M.

297 S.W.3d 151, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1634

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 24, 2009·No. No. WD 70770·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

The State of Missouri appeals from the trial court’s order granting a motion to suppress the results of a blood alcohol test administered to A.E.M. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that sufficient evidence exists to support the trial court’s order of suppression and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. A memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

The State of Missouri appeals from the trial court’s order granting a motion to suppress the results of a blood alcohol test administered to A.E.M. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that sufficient evidence exists to support the trial court’s order of suppression and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. A memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. A.E.M., 297 S.W.3d 151, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1634 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

297 S.W.3d 151 (State v. A.E.M.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.