State v. Adderly
602 So. 2d 556, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3905, 1992 WL 63114
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 1, 1992·No. No. 91-1295·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND/OR REQUEST TO CERTIFY QUESTION OF GREAT PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
We deny appellee’s motion for rehearing, but grant his motion to certify a question of great public importance. Accordingly, as this court did in State v. Scates, 585 So.2d 385 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), we certify the following question to be of great public importance:
MAY A TRIAL COURT PROPERLY DEPART FROM THE MINIMUM MANDATORY PROVISIONS OF SECTION [557]*557893.13(l)(e), FLORIDA STATUTES (1989), UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF SECTION 397.12, FLORIDA STATUTES (1989)?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Adderly, 602 So. 2d 556, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 3905, 1992 WL 63114 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
602 So. 2d 556 (State v. Adderly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Adderly v. State
605 So. 2d 459 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)