Adderly v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Adderly v. State

605 So. 2d 459, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 600, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 1625, 1992 WL 236199

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedSeptember 24, 1992

DocketNo. 79663

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 605 So. 2d 459 (Adderly v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adderly v. State, 605 So. 2d 459, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 600, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 1625, 1992 WL 236199 (Fla. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We review State v. Adderly, 596 So.2d 687 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), in which the court subsequently certified the following question as being of great public importance:

MAY A TRIAL COURT PROPERLY DEPART FROM THE MINIMUM MANDATORY PROVISIONS OF SECTION 893.13(l)(e), FLORIDA STATUTES (1989), UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF SECTION 397.12, FLORIDA STATUTES (1989)?

State v. Adderly, 602 So.2d 556 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (on motion for rehearing).

Upon the authority of Scales v. State, 603 So.2d 504 (Fla.1992), we answer the certified question in the affirmative. We quash the decision below and remand with directions to reinstate Adderly’s probation.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI