State v. A. P.
184 P.3d 1224, 220 Or. App. 129, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 649
Opinion
In this mental commitment case, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the trial court’s order of civil commitment. The state concedes that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence of the required elements for an order of involuntary commitment. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is insufficient.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. A. P., 184 P.3d 1224, 220 Or. App. 129, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 649 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).
184 P.3d 1224 (State v. A. P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In the Matter of Ap
184 P.3d 1224 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)