In the Matter of Ap

184 P.3d 1224, 220 Or. App. 129
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided May 14, 2008·No. 070666452, A136208·Published

Opinion

184 P.3d 1224 (2008)
220 Or. App. 129

In the Matter of A.P., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
A.P., Appellant.

Nos. 070666452, A136208.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Submitted March 7, 2008.
Decided May 14, 2008.

*1225 Lance D. Perdue filed the brief for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Linda Wicks, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and SCHUMAN, Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

In this mental commitment case, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the trial court's order of civil commitment. The state concedes that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence of the required elements for an order of involuntary commitment. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is insufficient.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In the Matter of Ap, 184 P.3d 1224, 220 Or. App. 129 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).

184 P.3d 1224 (In the Matter of Ap) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. A. P.
184 P.3d 1224 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)