In the Matter of Ap
This text of 184 P.3d 1224 (In the Matter of Ap) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Matter of A.P., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
A.P., Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
*1225 Lance D. Perdue filed the brief for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Linda Wicks, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and SCHUMAN, Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge.
PER CURIAM.
In this mental commitment case, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the trial court's order of civil commitment. The state concedes that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence of the required elements for an order of involuntary commitment. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is insufficient.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
184 P.3d 1224, 220 Or. App. 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-the-matter-of-ap-orctapp-2008.