State of Tennessee v. Mark A. Doolen, Jr.
This text of State of Tennessee v. Mark A. Doolen, Jr. (State of Tennessee v. Mark A. Doolen, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 25, 2001
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MARK A. DOOLEN, JR.
Direct Appeal Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dickson County No. CR5088 Allen Wallace, Judge
No. M2000-01953-CCA-R3-CD - August 29, 2001
In this appeal, Mark A. Doolen, Jr. challenges the order of the Dickson County Circuit Court requiring the appellant's payment of restitution in the amount of $6,611.76 for his vandalism of two antique automobiles. Following a review of the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that the appellant should have filed his appeal with the Tennessee Court of Appeals.
Tenn. R. App. P.3 Appeal as of Right; Case is Transferred to the Court of Appeals.
NORMA MCGEE OGLE , J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which DAVID H. WELLES and ALAN E. GLENN, JJ., joined.
Chris Young, Ashland City, Tennessee, for the appellant, Mark A. Doolen, Jr.
Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter' Elizabeth T. Ryan, Assistant Attorney General; Dan M. Alsobrooks, District Attorney General; Suzanne Lockert, Assistant District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.
OPINION
On May 3, 2000, the thirteen-year-old appellant was adjudicated delinquent in the Dickson County Juvenile Court on the basis of his violation of a probationary sentence and his guilt of possession of drug paraphernalia and vandalism. The juvenile court ordered, among other penalties, restitution in the amount of $6,611.76. The appellant appealed the juvenile court's order of restitution to the Dickson County Circuit Court pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann.§ 37-1-159 (a) (1996). On July 26, 2000, the circuit court conducted a de novo hearing on the issue of restitution, following which hearing the court ordered the appellant to pay restitution in the amount specified by the juvenile court. The appellant then filed a notice of appeal in this court.
We must conclude that, pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann.§37-1-159 (c), the appellant was required to appeal the order of the circuit court "to the court of appeals as provided by law." Tenn. R. App. P. 17 provides that "[i]f a case is appealed to the...Court of Criminal Appeals that should have been appealed to another court, the case shall be transferred to the proper court." Accordingly, we transfer this case to the Court of Appeals.
___________________________________ NORMA McGEE OGLE, JUDGE
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State of Tennessee v. Mark A. Doolen, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-tennessee-v-mark-a-doolen-jr-tenncrimapp-2001.