State of Oregon v. Trump
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 17 2026 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STATE OF OREGON; CITY OF Nos. 25-6268, 25-7194 PORTLAND; STATE OF CALIFORNIA, D.C. No. 3:25-cv-01756-IM Plaintiffs - Appellees, District of Oregon, Portland v. ORDER DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; PETER HEGSETH, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; KRISTI NOEM, in her official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
Defendants - Appellants.
MURGUIA, Chief Judge:
On January 27, 2026, Defendants-Appellants moved to dismiss the
consolidated appeals pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b)(2).
Case No. 25-6268, Dkt. 112; Case No. 25-7194, Dkt. 25. Plaintiffs-Appellees filed
a response (Case No. 25-6268, Dkt. 114; Case No. 25-7194, Dkt. 26), and
Defendants-Appellants filed a reply (Case No. 25-6268, Dkt. 115; Case No. 25-
7194, Dkt. 27). Defendants-Appellants’ motion to dismiss is granted. The consolidated
appeals (Case Nos. 25-6268 & 25-7194) are DISMISSED, with each party bearing
its own costs. Defendants-Appellants’ earlier motion to dismiss (Case No. 25-
6268, Dkt. 91) is denied as moot. This order constitutes the mandate of the court.
2 25-6268, 25-7194
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State of Oregon v. Trump (State of Oregon v. Trump) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.