State of Oregon v. Trump

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 8, 2026
Docket25-7194
StatusPublished

This text of State of Oregon v. Trump (State of Oregon v. Trump) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State of Oregon v. Trump, (9th Cir. 2026).

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 8 2026 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STATE OF OREGON; CITY OF Nos. 25-6268, 25-7194 PORTLAND; STATE OF CALIFORNIA, D.C. No. 3:25-cv-01756-IM Plaintiffs - Appellees, District of Oregon, Portland v. ORDER DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; PETER HEGSETH, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; KRISTI NOEM, in her official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,

Defendants - Appellants.

MURGUIA, Chief Judge:

On November 19, 2025, this court administratively stayed the district court’s

November 7, 2025, permanent injunction to the extent that it enjoins the

federalization of the Oregon National Guard. Dkt. No. 96. On December 29,

2025, this court issued an order directing the parties “to confer about the

procedural next steps for this appeal” “[i]n light of the United States Supreme

Court’s denial of the federal government’s application for a stay in Trump v. Illinois, No. 25A443 (U.S. Dec. 23, 2025).” Dkt. No. 104. The order also directed

the parties to “file either: (a) a joint proposal if agreement is reached or (b) separate

proposals if no agreement is reached.” Id.

The parties filed their separate proposals on January 7, 2026. Dkt. Nos. 106

& 107. Defendants represented that “[w]ithout prejudice to any future arguments

Defendants might make in this litigation, Defendants withdraw their request for a

stay pending appeal and agree to dissolution of the administrative stay.” Dkt No.

107. Defendants also represented that “Oregon National Guard members are

currently in transit to Fort Bliss, Texas, where they will demobilize, and that the

demobilization process will take approximately 7-14 days to complete.”

The administrative stay entered by this court on November 19, 2025, Dkt.

No. 96, is hereby VACATED.

2 25-6268, 25-7194

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State of Oregon v. Trump, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-oregon-v-trump-ca9-2026.