State of Maine v. Gadson

CourtSuperior Court of Maine
DecidedMay 16, 2017
DocketCUMcr-16-3882
StatusUnpublished

This text of State of Maine v. Gadson (State of Maine v. Gadson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State of Maine v. Gadson, (Me. Super. Ct. 2017).

Opinion

STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT CUMBERLAND, ss CRIMINAL ACTION DOCK.Er NO. CR-16-3882 CR-16-3884

STATE OF MAINE

V.

MICHELLE GADSON ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS Defendant and

STATE OF MAINE t=.!EC'D CLJMB CLE~KS OFG Mfi'/ 17 '17 F'M3'.02 V.

ISAIAH GADSON

Defendant

Before the court are defendants' motions to dismiss the complaints against them because

of alleged police misconduct. Hearing was held on March 16, 2017. Briefs were filed on April ! 3, 2017. The court has considered the evidence and arguments of counsel. For the following

reasons, the motions are denied.

Brent Abbou has been employed by the Portland Police Department for more than five

years. On July 4, 2016, he responded before 9:00 p.m. Lo a report of an assault on a security

guard at Bayside Village, a large apartment complex in Portland. He had also been instructed to

"criminal trespass" defendant Michelle Gadson, and had told her to leave the premises.

Officer Abbott was watching security video footage with two other security officers

behind the counter in the lobby of Bayside Village. Defendant Isaiah Gadson, who lived at

Bayside Village, entered the lobby. Mr. Gadson is nineteen years old, is 6'5", weighs 250 pounds, and works in the Old Port as a bouncer. He expected to meet his mother, Ms. Gadson, at

Bayside Village after the fireworks that evening.

There were four people and the officers in the lobby at Bayside Village. (St.'s Ex. 14.)

Mr. Gadson walked into the lobby quickly and stopped at the counter. His arms were raised,

consistent with making an inquiry. (St.'s Ex. 14.) He asked who had criminal trespassed his

mother.

Officer Abbott immediately walked around the counter and approached Mr. Gadson, who

did not move and who had his arms pointed down in front of him. (St.'s Ex. 14.) Officer Abbott

pushed Mr. Gadson with both hands, pointed to the door, and told Mr. Gadson to leave. (St.'s Ex.

14.) Officer Abbott continued to speak to Mr. Gadson, who did not move and kept his arms

down in front of him. (St.'s Ex. 14.) Officer Abbott was saying, "go." (St.'s Ex. 14.) Mr.

Gadson responded that he lived there and did not have to leave.

Officer Abbott then pulled his laser, pointed it directly in Mr. Gadson's face, and "dotted

his forehead." (St.'s Ex. 14.) Mr. Gadson reacted and stepped back but remained standing

where he was with his arms down in front of him. (St.'s Ex. 14.) Officer Abbott raised the taser

again and continued to point to the door and to order Mr. Gadson to leave. (St.'s Ex. 14.)

Officer Abbott then looked away from Mr. Gadson and spoke on his radio. (St.'s Ex . 14.) Mr.

Gadson turned and walked toward the door. Officer Abbott shoved the taser into Mr. Gadson's

back and kept the taser pointed at Mr. Gadson's back as Officer Abbott followed Mr. Gadson to

the door. (St.'s Ex. 14.) Officer Abbott pushed Mr. Gadson out of the lobby toward Lhe outside

and followed him with the taser still in Officer Abbott's hand. (St.'s Ex. 14.) Mr. Gadson did

not use force. (St.'s Ex. 14.) At this point, Mr. Gadson had not committed a crime.

2 Outside, five people and another officer were present initially but those numbers

increased. (St.'s Ex. 14.) Officer Abbott continued to speak in an aggressive manner to Mr.

Gadson. (St.'s Ex. 14.) Mr. Gadson's brother stepped toward Mr. Gadson and Office Abbott,

and the brother extended his arm between the two. (St.'s Ex. 14.) Mr. Gadson continued to

stand with his arms down in front of him . (St.'s Ex. 14.) Officer Abbott moved closer to Mr.

Gadson, who backed up, and his brother moved his body between Officer Abbott and Mr.

Gadson . (St.'s Ex . 14.) Mr. Gadson backed up again as Officer Abbott approached. (St.'s Ex.

14.)

Officer Abbott then walked off the porch and shoved with both hands another spectator

who was speaking but not acting aggressively. (St's Ex. 14.) Officer Abbott then engaged in a

conversation with that person and approached the person closely. (St.'s Ex. 14.) The other

officers stood by. (St. 's Ex. 14.) The potential for this situation to deteriorate was great.

Officer Bennis, a P011Iand Police Department officer of thirteen years, was dispatched to

Bayside Village as additional back up. Officer Bennis was concerned about the crowd, which

remained excited because of the previous incident, and tried to contain the crowd.

Officer Bennis called for additional police back up. Members of the crowd were yelling

and there was significant commotion. (Defs.' Ex. 1.) Sergeant Noyes arrived at Bayside Village

at 9:06 p.m. in response lo the call for additional help, and spoke to Ms. Gadson. She was

standing in the road because she was not allowed on the property. Sergeant Noyes asked her to

step out of the road because traffic was passing very close to her. (Defs.' Ex. 1.) She continued

filming the scene. (Defs.' Ex. 1.) Officer Bennis asked her again to move and told her she was

obstructing a public way. She did not move, ignored Officer Rennis's requests, and continued

filming. (Def.'s Ex. I.)

3 Sergeant Noyes placed Ms . Gadson's arm behind her back to arrest her and tried to put

handcuffs on her. Members of the crowd, including Mr. Gadson, moved quickly toward Sergeant

Noyes and Ms. Gadson. Mr. Gadson yelled, "do not touch my mother."

The ensuing events are difficult to identify on the video, the beginning of which the court

has viewed many times, partly because a car passed between the camera and the scene at a

critkal time. (Defs.' Ex. 1, Stream 1.) At least three civilians were between Mr. Gadson,

Sergeant Noyes and Ms. Gadson as the civilians approached Sergeant Noyes and Ms. Gadson. It

does not appear that another officer was between Sergeant Noyes, Ms. Gadson, and the

approaching crowd. (Defs.' Ex. 1.)

Three officers followed Mr. Gadson as he approached Ms. Gads

facing toward Ms. Gadson. He was taken down from behind to prevent him from reaching

Sergeant Noyes and Ms. Gadson. Two other officers ran to the scene of the struggle. (Defs.' Ex.

1.)

Officer Matt Pavlis, who is 5'9" and weighs 180 pounds, arrived at 9:05 p.rn. in response

to the call for additional backup. Based on the testimony, there is no dispute that Mr. Gadson

and Officer Pavlis were primarily involved in the altercation. Mr. Gadson was beneath Officer

Pavlis. Mr. Gadson's arms were flailing as he tried to punch Officer Pavlis. Officer Pavlis

punched Mr. Gadson seven or eight times in his side.

During the altercation, Ms. Gadson attempted to walk toward her son. Portland Police

Department Officer Graham Hults, Sergeant Noyes, and Lieutenant Hutcheson stepped in front

of her at various times.

4 Officer Abbott grabbed his baton and pushed it multiple times into the back of Mr.

Gadson's leg. Sergeant Noyes yelled "spray" one or two times and then used pepper spray on

Mr. Gadson. Mr. Gadson stoppe~ resisting and was handcuffed.

The officers poured water on Mr. Gadson's eyes and contacted Med Cuc. (St.'s Exs. 10­

12.) Paramedics arrived at the scene and evaluated Mr. Gadson. There was no visible injury to

him except for the effect of the spray. Mr. Gadson reported to Med Cue that his back was

injured.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Olmstead v. United States
277 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1928)
Rochin v. California
342 U.S. 165 (Supreme Court, 1952)
United States v. Russell
411 U.S. 423 (Supreme Court, 1973)
Roberts v. State of Maine
48 F.3d 1287 (First Circuit, 1995)
State v. Stade
683 A.2d 164 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State of Maine v. Gadson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-of-maine-v-gadson-mesuperct-2017.