State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Lucano

11 A.D.3d 548, 783 N.Y.S.2d 618, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12032
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 12, 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 11 A.D.3d 548 (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Lucano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Lucano, 11 A.D.3d 548, 783 N.Y.S.2d 618, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12032 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of a claim for supplementary underinsured motorist benefits, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, J), dated December 22, 2003, which granted the petition and permanently stayed arbitration.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The appellant failed to obtain the petitioner’s written consent prior to settlement of the underlying negligence action and execution of a release which failed to preserve the petitioner’s subrogation rights (see Matter of Integon Ins. Co. v Battaglia, 292 AD2d 527 [2002]; Friedman v Allstate Ins. Co., 268 AD2d 558 [2000]; Weinberg v Transamerica Ins. Co., 62 NY2d 379 [1984]; cf. Matter of American Home Assur. Co. v Williams, 282 AD2d 674 [2001]). Thus, the Supreme Court correctly determined that the appellant was precluded from asserting a claim for benefits under the supplementary underinsured motorist provision of the petitioner’s insurance policy.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, her belated verification that no excess insurance was available did not obviate the prejudice to the petitioner’s subrogation rights since the tortfeasors were not judgment proof (see Matter of New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v Danaher, 290 AD2d 783, 785 [2002]; Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. [Brown], 288 AD2d 955 [2001]). Prudenti, P.J., Krausman, Adams and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Travelers Home & Marine Insurance v. Kanner
103 A.D.3d 736 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Metlife Auto & Home v. Zampino
65 A.D.3d 1151 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 A.D.3d 548, 783 N.Y.S.2d 618, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12032, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-v-lucano-nyappdiv-2004.