Metlife Auto & Home v. Zampino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Metlife Auto & Home v. Zampino

65 A.D.3d 1150, 885 N.Y.S.2d 227

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 15, 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 65 A.D.3d 1150 (Metlife Auto & Home v. Zampino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Metlife Auto & Home v. Zampino, 65 A.D.3d 1150, 885 N.Y.S.2d 227 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of a claim for uninsured motorist benefits, Debra Zampino appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Galasso, J.), dated January 29, 2008, which directed a hearing to determine the petitioner’s subrogation rights.

[1151]*1151Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from the order must be dismissed, as no appeal lies as of right from an order which directs a hearing to aid in the disposition of a motion and leave to appeal has not been granted (see Hochhauser v Electric Ins. Co., 46 AD3d 174, 185 [2007]), and, in any event, the order was superseded by an order of the same court entered August 8, 2008 (see Matter of Metlife Auto & Home v Zampino, 65 AD3d 1151 [2009] [decided herewith]). Mastro, J.P., Dickerson, Eng and Hall, JJ., concur. [See 18 Misc 3d 1123(A), 2008 NY Slip Op 50177(U).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of a claim for uninsured motorist benefits, Debra Zampino appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Galasso, J.), dated January 29, 2008, which directed a hearing to determine the petitioner’s subrogation rights.

[1151]*1151Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from the order must be dismissed, as no appeal lies as of right from an order which directs a hearing to aid in the disposition of a motion and leave to appeal has not been granted (see Hochhauser v Electric Ins. Co., 46 AD3d 174, 185 [2007]), and, in any event, the order was superseded by an order of the same court entered August 8, 2008 (see Matter of Metlife Auto & Home v Zampino, 65 AD3d 1151 [2009] [decided herewith]). Mastro, J.P., Dickerson, Eng and Hall, JJ., concur. [See 18 Misc 3d 1123(A), 2008 NY Slip Op 50177(U).]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 A.D.3d 1150, 885 N.Y.S.2d 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metlife-auto-home-v-zampino-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack