State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Commonwealth, Department of Insurance

747 A.2d 355, 560 Pa. 595, 2000 Pa. LEXIS 454
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 25, 2000·No. Appeal 105 M.D. Appeal Docket 1999·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Order affirmed.

Justice SAYLOR files a dissenting statement in which Justices ZAPPALA and CASTILLE join.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Commonwealth, Department of Insurance, 747 A.2d 355, 560 Pa. 595, 2000 Pa. LEXIS 454 (Pa. 2000).

747 A.2d 355 (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Commonwealth, Department of Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Angeles Roca First Judicial District Philadelphia County
173 A.3d 1176 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2017)
In Re: Angeles Roca, Judge
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2017
Anter Associates v. Zoning Hearing Board
79 A.3d 1230 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2013)
Pickford v. Department of Environmental Protection
967 A.2d 414 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)
Freedman v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing
842 A.2d 494 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2004)
Neilson v. Zoning Hearing Board of the Municipality of Mt. Lebanon
786 A.2d 1049 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2001)