State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Porr

496 So. 2d 816, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 548, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 2757
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 23, 1986·No. Nos. 65656, 65674·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We accepted jurisdiction to review Porr v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 452 So.2d 93 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) pending our review of Curtin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 449 So.2d 293 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984) which was relied upon by the district court below. We recently dismissed the petition for review in Curtin. State Farm Mutual Insurance Company v. Curtin, 496 So.2d 815 (Fla.1986). Finding no conflict to support this Court’s jurisdiction, the petitions for review of both Porr and State Farm are dismissed.

It is so ordered.

McDonald, C.J., and ADKINS, BOYD, EHRLICH, SHAW and BARKETT, JJ., concur. OVERTON, J., dissents.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ENTERTAINED BY THE COURT. SEE FLA.R.APP.P. 9.330(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Porr, 496 So. 2d 816, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 548, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 2757 (Fla. 1986).

496 So. 2d 816 (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Porr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Porr v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
452 So. 2d 93 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Curtin v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
449 So. 2d 293 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Curtin
496 So. 2d 815 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)