State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Curtin

496 So. 2d 815, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 548, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 2760
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 23, 1986·No. No. 65387·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We accepted jurisdiction to review Cur-tin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 449 So.2d 293 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984) pending our review of Boynton v. Allstate Insurance Co., 443 So.2d 427 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), quashed, 486 So.2d 552 (Fla.1986). Although we recently quashed the district court decision in Boynton, we expressly approved of that portion of the [816] opinion which was relied on by the district court in the instant case. Finding no conflict to support this Court’s jurisdiction, the petition for review is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

McDonald, C.J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW and BARRETT, JJ., concur.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ENTERTAINED BY THE COURT. SEE FLA.R.APP.P. 9.330(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Curtin, 496 So. 2d 815, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 548, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 2760 (Fla. 1986).

496 So. 2d 815 (State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Curtin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Baker
543 So. 2d 847 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Hall v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
514 So. 2d 853 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1987)
Amica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Wells
507 So. 2d 750 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Porr
496 So. 2d 816 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)