State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Team Orion Europe, SA

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedApril 28, 2023
Docket7:23-cv-02000
StatusUnknown

This text of State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Team Orion Europe, SA (State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Team Orion Europe, SA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Team Orion Europe, SA, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, as subrogee of Sydlane and Valerie Bhikarry,

No. 23-CV-2000 (KMK) Plaintiff,

ORDER v.

TEAM ORION EUROPE, SA, et al.,

Defendants.

KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge:

Plaintiff State Farm Fire and Casualty Company brings this products liability action against Team Orion Europe, SA; Neidhart SA; Shenzen Grepow Battery Co., Ltd.; and Horizon Hobby, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”). (See Compl. (Dkt. No. 1-1).) This Action was originally commenced in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Orange. (See Compl.) On March 8, 2023, Defendant Horizon Lobby, LLC (“Horizon”) filed a Notice of Removal to this Court. (Not. of Removal (Dkt. No. 1).) As relevant here, in its Notice of Removal, Horizon indicated that it is a citizen of Illinois. (Id. at 2.) According to the Notice, Plaintiff is also a citizen of Illinois. (Id.) The Notice indicates that 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) is the basis for removal. (Id.) On March 14, 2023, the Court issued an Order directing Horizon to show cause why this Action should not be remanded to New York Supreme Court for lack of jurisdiction. (Order (Dkt. No. 3).) On April 7, 2023, Horizon responded and stated in relevant part that “So long as the citizenship of any plaintiff is diverse from that of all defendants and the amount in controversy exceeds the threshold, as is the case here, diversity jurisdiction exists under the statute.” (Letter from Stephen D. Straus, Esq. to Court (April 7, 2023) at 2 (Dkt. No. 4).) It is blackletter law that a federal court has jurisdiction over a removed action under 28

U.S.C. § 1332(a) only where there is complete diversity of parties such that no plaintiff and no defendant are from the same state. See, e.g., Strawbridge v. Curtiss, 7 U.S. 267, 267 (1806); Battaglia v. Shore Parkway Owner LLC, 249 F. Supp. 3d 668, 670 (E.D.N.Y. 2017) (“Federal courts only have diversity jurisdiction when there is complete diversity between the parties—that is, when all plaintiffs are citizens of different states from all defendants.” (citing, inter alia, Lincoln Prop. Co. v. Roche, 546 U.S. 81, 89 (2005)). Here, Horizon and Plaintiff are citizens of the same state. Complete diversity of parties, therefore, does not exist. This case is remanded to the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Orange. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending Letter Motion, (Dkt. No. 73), mail a certified copy of this Order to the Clerk of the State Court, and close this case.

SO ORDERED. DATED: April 28, 2023 White Plains, New York ____________________________________ KENNETH M. KARAS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strawbridge v. Curtiss
7 U.S. 267 (Supreme Court, 1806)
Lincoln Property Co. v. Roche
546 U.S. 81 (Supreme Court, 2005)
Battaglia v. Shore Parkway Owner LLC
249 F. Supp. 3d 668 (E.D. New York, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Team Orion Europe, SA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-farm-fire-and-casualty-company-v-team-orion-europe-sa-nysd-2023.