State ex rel. Youngstown City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Youngstown

711 N.E.2d 232, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1404, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1817
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 16, 1999·No. 98-1428·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In Mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s motion for an order for respondents to show cause why they should not be held in contempt for failure to comply with our December 2, 1998 order,

IT IS ORDERED that respondents show cause why they should not be held in contempt of our December 2, 1998 order. Any evidence the parties intend to present on the contempt issue is due within thirty days; respondents’ brief is due within twenty days after the submission of evidence; relator’s brief is due within twenty days after the filing of respondents’ brief; and respondents’ reply brief is due within five days after the filing of relator’s brief. See State ex rel. Howard v. Ferreri (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 1543, 650 N.E.2d 903.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Youngstown City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Youngstown, 711 N.E.2d 232, 86 Ohio St. 3d 1404, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1817 (Ohio 1999).

711 N.E.2d 232 (State ex rel. Youngstown City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Youngstown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Myers v. Brown
738 N.E.2d 381 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)