State ex rel. Youngstown City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Youngstown
716 N.E.2d 1168, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1406, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3151
Opinion
In Mandamus. On response to show cause order. Respondents are found not to be in contempt. Nevertheless, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondents must continue to comply with our December 1998 writ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Youngstown City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Youngstown, 716 N.E.2d 1168, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1406, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 3151 (Ohio 1999).
716 N.E.2d 1168 (State ex rel. Youngstown City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Youngstown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Susany, 07 Ma 7 (3-20-2008)
2008 Ohio 1543 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)
State v. Carey, 88487 (2-21-2008)
2008 Ohio 698 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)
State v. Lehman, Unpublished Decision (12-14-2001)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2001
Young v. Spring Valley, Unpublished Decision (10-31-2001)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2001
State v. Biros
2001 Ohio 1339 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)
State v. Shupe, Unpublished Decision (10-27-2000)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2000
State v. Kelly, Unpublished Decision (6-21-2000)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2000
State v. Deitz, Unpublished Decision (4-12-2000)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2000
State v. Evans, Unpublished Decision (3-10-2000)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2000