State ex rel. Youngblood v. Henderson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Youngblood v. Henderson

243 So. 2d 818, 257 La. 739, 1971 La. LEXIS 4461

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedFebruary 17, 1971

DocketNo. 51191

StatusPublished

This text of 243 So. 2d 818 (State ex rel. Youngblood v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Youngblood v. Henderson, 243 So. 2d 818, 257 La. 739, 1971 La. LEXIS 4461 (La. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

The facts at the evidentiary hearing disprove petitioner’s allegation that no counsel was appointed to represent and advise him prior to his plea of guilty. Petitioner further has not proved he was not fully advised of his rights prior to his plea, and the petitioner does not allege that he was not in fact guilty, as indicated by the evidence. Jones v. Smith, 311 F.2d 475 (5 Cir., 1969) is factually distinguishable.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The facts at the evidentiary hearing disprove petitioner’s allegation that no counsel was appointed to represent and advise him prior to his plea of guilty. Petitioner further has not proved he was not fully advised of his rights prior to his plea, and the petitioner does not allege that he was not in fact guilty, as indicated by the evidence. Jones v. Smith, 311 F.2d 475 (5 Cir., 1969) is factually distinguishable.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 So. 2d 818, 257 La. 739, 1971 La. LEXIS 4461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-youngblood-v-henderson-la-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack