State ex rel. Y & O Coal Co. v. Industrial Commission

532 N.E.2d 745, 40 Ohio St. 3d 165, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 442
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 30, 1988·No. No. 87-339·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Mandamus will not lie where there is a plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. State, ex rel. Pressley, v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St. 2d 141, 40 O.O. 2d 141, 228 N.E. 2d 631, paragraph three of the syllabus. In State, ex rel. Wean United, Inc., v. Indus. Comm. (1988), 37 Ohio St. 3d 203, 524 N.E. 2d 896, we held that disputes involving handicap reimbursement are appealable under R.C. 4123.519. The availability of an R.C. 4123.519 appeal thus precludes appellants from relief in mandamus.

Based on our decision in Wean United, the judgment of the appellate court is hereby affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., concurs separately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Y & O Coal Co. v. Industrial Commission, 532 N.E.2d 745, 40 Ohio St. 3d 165, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 442 (Ohio 1988).

532 N.E.2d 745 (State ex rel. Y & O Coal Co. v. Industrial Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Afrates v. City of Lorain
584 N.E.2d 1175 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1992)
State ex rel. McGinnis v. Industrial Commission
568 N.E.2d 665 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1991)
Cooley v. Dairy Mart Corp.
584 N.E.2d 31 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1990)