State Ex Rel. Woodward v. Lee

Supreme Court of Florida

State Ex Rel. Woodward v. Lee

158 So. 879, 118 Fla. 245

DecidedJanuary 24, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 158 So. 879 (State Ex Rel. Woodward v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Woodward v. Lee, 158 So. 879, 118 Fla. 245 (Fla. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Court having on the 6th day of November, 1934, entered an order referring this matter to the Honorable E. C. Love, one of the Circuit Judges of the Second Judicial Circuit of Florida, with the request and *246 authority to said Circuit Judge to act as Commissioner of this Court and as such Commissioner to take and report testimony proffered herein and to report same with his findings of fact thereon for the consideration of this Court; and Judge Love having complied with the request and direction of this Court in the premises and having submitted to this Court his report of the testimony offered in this case before him as such Commissioner and his findings of fact thereupon all of which has been considered by this Court, it is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the report of the said Circuit Judge as Commissioner be approved and adopted by this Court, such report holding drat the Relator was employed by the Railroad Assessment Board to be Railroad Assessment Engineer and that the amount due him as salary up to July 1, 1933, was the sum of $1,471.80.

Ellis, Terrell and Buford, J. J., and Hutchison, Circuit Judge, concur.

It is thereupon ordered and adjudged by the Court that judgment be entered in favor of the Relator herein awarding him a peremptory writ of mandamus as prayed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Brown, J., not participating. Davis, J., disqualified

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The Court having on the 6th day of November, 1934, entered an order referring this matter to the Honorable E. C. Love, one of the Circuit Judges of the Second Judicial Circuit of Florida, with the request and *246 authority to said Circuit Judge to act as Commissioner of this Court and as such Commissioner to take and report testimony proffered herein and to report same with his findings of fact thereon for the consideration of this Court; and Judge Love having complied with the request and direction of this Court in the premises and having submitted to this Court his report of the testimony offered in this case before him as such Commissioner and his findings of fact thereupon all of which has been considered by this Court, it is ordered and adjudged by the Court that the report of the said Circuit Judge as Commissioner be approved and adopted by this Court, such report holding drat the Relator was employed by the Railroad Assessment Board to be Railroad Assessment Engineer and that the amount due him as salary up to July 1, 1933, was the sum of $1,471.80.

Ellis, Terrell and Buford, J. J., and Hutchison, Circuit Judge, concur.

It is thereupon ordered and adjudged by the Court that judgment be entered in favor of the Relator herein awarding him a peremptory writ of mandamus as prayed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Brown, J., not participating. Davis, J., disqualified

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

158 So. 879, 118 Fla. 245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-woodward-v-lee-fla-1935.