State Ex Rel. Williams v. Whitman
This text of 150 So. 136 (State Ex Rel. Williams v. Whitman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 198 This case is before us on motion to quash alternative writ of mandamus.
On consideration of the motion, the Court being advised of its opinion in the premises, and having considered briefs and arguments therein submitted by the respective parties.
It is now ordered and adjudged that the motion to quash be, and the same is hereby, overruled and denied and respondents are allowed fifteen (15) days from this date in which to file answer, return or other pleading as they may be advised.
It is so ordered.
DAVIS, C. J., WHITFIELD, TERRELL and BUFORD, J. J., concur.
BROWN, J., dissents.
ELLIS, J., not participating.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
150 So. 136, 116 Fla. 196, 95 A.L.R. 1416, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-williams-v-whitman-fla-1933.