State ex rel. Williams v. McGinty
This text of 2011 Ohio 2641 (State ex rel. Williams v. McGinty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying the request of appellant, Larry Williams, for a writ of procedendo to compel appellee, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Judge Timothy J. McGinty, to issue a valid final, appealable order in his criminal case. Judge McGinty’s December 2009 sentencing entry in the criminal case fully complied with Crim.R. 32(C) by including the findings of the court and guilty pleas entered by Williams upon which his convictions were based, the sentence, the signature of the judge, and the entry on the journal by the clerk of court. See State ex rel. Cunningham v. Lindeman, 126 Ohio St.3d 481, 2010-Ohio-4388, 935 N.E.2d 393, ¶ 1.
{¶ 2} Insofar as Judge McGinty ordered the sheriff to calculate the jail-time credit, he erred in doing so; the calculation of jail-time credit is the judge’s duty. State ex rel. Corder v. Wilson (1991), 68 Ohio App.3d 567, 589 N.E.2d 113; State ex rel. Summers v. Saffold, Cuyahoga App. No. 82546, 2003-Ohio-3542, 2003 WL 21513096. But this error was remediable in the ordinary course of law by appeal or motion for jail-time credit. See State ex rel. Jones v. O’Connor (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 426, 704 N.E.2d 1223.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2011 Ohio 2641, 129 Ohio St. 3d 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-williams-v-mcginty-ohio-2011.