State ex rel. Wikberg v. Henderson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Wikberg v. Henderson

256 So. 2d 639, 260 La. 595, 1972 La. LEXIS 5682

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedFebruary 3, 1972

DocketNo. 52100

StatusPublished

This text of 256 So. 2d 639 (State ex rel. Wikberg v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Wikberg v. Henderson, 256 So. 2d 639, 260 La. 595, 1972 La. LEXIS 5682 (La. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Ronald G. Wikberg applying for writs of mandamus and habeas corpus.

Writ denied. The Trial Judge’s return shows that the application in that court for habeas corpus has been acted upon. Hence this application for mandamus is moot. Applicant’s right to apply here for review of the ruling on the application for habeas corpus is reserved.

BARHAM, J., and DIXON, J., concur in the denial.

Our docket #51,078, 257 La. 446, 242 So.2d 574 has a return by the trial court of a transcript of an evidentiary hearing in response to our order of January 13, 1971. Appointed counsel informed this court in that matter that the review of the trial court denial of the writ after the hearing in response to our order will be sought in this court. That matter is also pending awaiting proper application to this Court for review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Ronald G. Wikberg applying for writs of mandamus and habeas corpus.

Writ denied. The Trial Judge’s return shows that the application in that court for habeas corpus has been acted upon. Hence this application for mandamus is moot. Applicant’s right to apply here for review of the ruling on the application for habeas corpus is reserved.

BARHAM, J., and DIXON, J., concur in the denial.

Our docket #51,078, 257 La. 446, 242 So.2d 574 has a return by the trial court of a transcript of an evidentiary hearing in response to our order of January 13, 1971. Appointed counsel informed this court in that matter that the review of the trial court denial of the writ after the hearing in response to our order will be sought in this court. That matter is also pending awaiting proper application to this Court for review.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 So. 2d 639, 260 La. 595, 1972 La. LEXIS 5682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-wikberg-v-henderson-la-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack