State ex rel. White v. Goldsberry

664 N.E.2d 535, 75 Ohio St. 3d 1483
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. White v. Goldsberry. Read the opinion of the Court — 85 Ohio St. 3d 153
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1996·No. 96-774·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. Answer treated as motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. White v. Goldsberry, 664 N.E.2d 535, 75 Ohio St. 3d 1483 (Ohio 1996).

664 N.E.2d 535 (State ex rel. White v. Goldsberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.