State ex rel. White v. Goldsberry
667 N.E.2d 391, 76 Ohio St. 3d 271
Opinion
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in its judgment entry.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. White v. Goldsberry, 667 N.E.2d 391, 76 Ohio St. 3d 271 (Ohio 1996).
667 N.E.2d 391 (State ex rel. White v. Goldsberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Krichbaum, 07 Ma 61 (6-15-2007)
2007 Ohio 3037 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)
State ex rel. Reynolds v. Basinger
99 Ohio St. 3d 303 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)
Stewart v. Corrigan, Unpublished Decision (4-11-2002)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2002
State v. Massey, Unpublished Decision (11-05-2001)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2001
State Ex Rel. Mubashshir v. Callahan, Unpublished Decision (4-6-2000)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2000
State v. Friedland, Unpublished Decision (10-14-1999)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 1999
State ex rel. Carroll v. Corrigan
705 N.E.2d 1226 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
State ex rel. White v. Goldsberry
1996 Ohio 406 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)