State Ex Rel. Weary v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State Ex Rel. Weary v. State

12 So. 3d 968, 2009 La. LEXIS 2214, 2009 WL 2170137

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 26, 2009

Docket2008-KP-2673

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 12 So. 3d 968 (State Ex Rel. Weary v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Weary v. State, 12 So. 3d 968, 2009 La. LEXIS 2214, 2009 WL 2170137 (La. 2009).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.¹

11 Granted. This case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings. In accord with the criteria and procedures set forth in La.S.Ct. Rule 17, § 13, the district court is directed to enroll Edward Q. Cas-siday, of the firm of Fredrikson & Byron, Minneapolis, Minnesota, as co-counsel of record pro hac vice associated with the Capital Post-Conviction Project of Louisiana to represent relator, Michael Weary, in post-conviction proceedings. The district court is further directed to provide counsel with 180 days from the date of enrollment in which to file a supplemental application for post-conviction relief on relator’s behalf.

KNOLL, J., dissents in part and concurs in part, and assigns reasons. VICTORY, J., dissents in part and concurs in part for reasons assigned by Justice KNOLL. WEIMER, J., dissents in part & concurs in part, and assigns reasons.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.¹

11 Granted. This case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings. In accord with the criteria and procedures set forth in La.S.Ct. Rule 17, § 13, the district court is directed to enroll Edward Q. Cas-siday, of the firm of Fredrikson & Byron, Minneapolis, Minnesota, as co-counsel of record pro hac vice associated with the Capital Post-Conviction Project of Louisiana to represent relator, Michael Weary, in post-conviction proceedings. The district court is further directed to provide counsel with 180 days from the date of enrollment in which to file a supplemental application for post-conviction relief on relator’s behalf.

KNOLL, J., dissents in part and concurs in part, and assigns reasons. VICTORY, J., dissents in part and concurs in part for reasons assigned by Justice KNOLL. WEIMER, J., dissents in part & concurs in part, and assigns reasons.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 So. 3d 968, 2009 La. LEXIS 2214, 2009 WL 2170137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-weary-v-state-la-2009.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack