State Ex Rel. Weary v. State

12 So. 3d 968, 2009 La. LEXIS 2214, 2009 WL 2170137
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 26, 2009·No. 2008-KP-2673·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.1

11 Granted. This case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings. In accord with the criteria and procedures set forth in La.S.Ct. Rule 17, § 13, the district court is directed to enroll Edward Q. Cas-siday, of the firm of Fredrikson & Byron, Minneapolis, Minnesota, as co-counsel of record pro hac vice associated with the Capital Post-Conviction Project of Louisiana to represent relator, Michael Weary, in post-conviction proceedings. The district court is further directed to provide counsel with 180 days from the date of enrollment in which to file a supplemental application for post-conviction relief on relator’s behalf.

KNOLL, J., dissents in part and concurs in part, and assigns reasons. VICTORY, J., dissents in part and concurs in part for reasons assigned by Justice KNOLL. WEIMER, J., dissents in part & concurs in part, and assigns reasons.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Weary v. State, 12 So. 3d 968, 2009 La. LEXIS 2214, 2009 WL 2170137 (La. 2009).

12 So. 3d 968 (State Ex Rel. Weary v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State of Louisiana v. Davis Dwayne Freeman
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2014
In Re Morgan
237 P.3d 993 (California Supreme Court, 2010)
State Ex Rel. Weary v. State
12 So. 3d 968 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2009)