State ex rel. Watkins v. Donahey

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Watkins v. Donahey

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 389

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 3, 1924

DocketNo. 18239

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 389 (State ex rel. Watkins v. Donahey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Watkins v. Donahey, 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 389 (Ohio 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

MARSHALL, C. J.

Section 6212-34, General Code (109 O. L. 9), is a valid exercise of legislative power, and provides a remedy for removal of all officers, including classified service, who are charged with the duty of enforcement of laws relating to intoxicating liquors, in addition to the power of removal lodged in civil service commission by Section 4886-17a, General Code.

Writ denied.

Robinson, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur. Wanamaker, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MARSHALL, C. J.

Section 6212-34, General Code (109 O. L. 9), is a valid exercise of legislative power, and provides a remedy for removal of all officers, including classified service, who are charged with the duty of enforcement of laws relating to intoxicating liquors, in addition to the power of removal lodged in civil service commission by Section 4886-17a, General Code.

Writ denied.

Robinson, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur. Wanamaker, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-watkins-v-donahey-ohio-1924.