State ex rel. Walls v. Ohio Masonic Home

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Walls v. Ohio Masonic Home

2003 Ohio 370, 98 Ohio St. 3d 285

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 12, 2003

Docket2002-0236

StatusPublished

This text of 2003 Ohio 370 (State ex rel. Walls v. Ohio Masonic Home) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Walls v. Ohio Masonic Home, 2003 Ohio 370, 98 Ohio St. 3d 285 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

[Cite as State ex rel. Walls v. Ohio Masonic Home, 98 Ohio St.3d 285, 2003-Ohio-370.]

THE STATE EX REL. WALLS, APPELLANT, v. OHIO MASONIC HOME ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Walls v. Ohio Masonic Home, 98 Ohio St.3d 285, 2003- Ohio-370.] Workers’ compensation — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 2002-0236 — Submitted January 7, 2003 — Decided February 12, 2003.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 01AP-267. __________________ {¶1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, COOK, LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’CONNOR, JJ., concur. F.E. SWEENEY, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________ Robert M. Robinson, for appellant. Martin, Browne, Hull & Harper, P.L.L., and Richard F. Heil Jr., for appellee Ohio Masonic Home. Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Daniel M. Hall, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[Cite as State ex rel. Walls v. Ohio Masonic Home, 98 Ohio St.3d 285, 2003-Ohio-370.]

THE STATE EX REL. WALLS, APPELLANT, v. OHIO MASONIC HOME ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Walls v. Ohio Masonic Home, 98 Ohio St.3d 285, 2003- Ohio-370.] Workers’ compensation — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 2002-0236 — Submitted January 7, 2003 — Decided February 12, 2003.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 01AP-267. __________________ {¶1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, COOK, LUNDBERG STRATTON and O’CONNOR, JJ., concur. F.E. SWEENEY, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________ Robert M. Robinson, for appellant. Martin, Browne, Hull & Harper, P.L.L., and Richard F. Heil Jr., for appellee Ohio Masonic Home. Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Daniel M. Hall, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2003 Ohio 370, 98 Ohio St. 3d 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-walls-v-ohio-masonic-home-ohio-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack