State ex rel. Vanderwall v. Mayor of Phillips

114 N.W. 802, 134 Wis. 437, 1908 Wisc. LEXIS 44
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 28, 1908
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 114 N.W. 802 (State ex rel. Vanderwall v. Mayor of Phillips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Vanderwall v. Mayor of Phillips, 114 N.W. 802, 134 Wis. 437, 1908 Wisc. LEXIS 44 (Wis. 1908).

Opinion

UuRwiN, J.

Giving the record before us the most favorable construction it will bear upon the facts admitted by the demurrer to the return to the writ of mandamus, it shows simply an attempt by the petitioner to’compel the common council to proceed with the performance of its quasi-judicial or legislativa duties respecting the construction of a sewer. This is plain from the alternative writ and return thereto. The question, therefore, is whether mcmdamus will be awarded for such purpose. The duty of providing for and constructing sewers by a municipality is a quasi-judicial or legislative power involving judgment and discretion. Hart v. Neillsville, 125 Wis. 546, 104 N. W. 699; 2 Dillon, Mun. Corp. (4th ed.) § 1046. Such quasi-judicial or legislative duty will not be controlled by mcmdamus. State ex rel. Rudolph v. Hutchinson, ante, p. 283, 114 N. W. 453; Wood, Mandamus, 9; Spelling, Inj. & Extr. Rem. (2d ed.) § 1433. The expediency of entering upon public improvements is left almost entirely to the judgment of the local authorities. 2 Dillon, Mun. Corp. (4th ed.) § 1046; State ex rel. Lord v. Washington Co. 2 Pin. 552; State ex rel. O’Donnell v. Benzenberg, 108 Wis. 435, 84 N. W. 858. In State ex rel. Comstock v. Joint School Dist. 65 Wis. 631, 638, 27 N. W. 829, it is said: “The books abound with cases which assert and enforce the rule that mandamus will not lie to control the exercise of discretion or official judgment” — citing High, Extr. Rem. § § 24, 42, and cases cited; State ex rel. Lord v. [443]*443Washington Co. 2 Pin. 552; State ex rel. Gill v. Watertown, 9 Wis. 254; State ex rel. Byrne v. Harvey, 11 Wis. 83; State ex rel. Martin v. Doyle, 38 Wis. 92.

We think it clear that no case was made for the issuance of a writ of mandamus, and therefore the demurrer to the return should have been overruled.

By the Court. — The order appealed from is reversed, and the action remanded with instructions to overrule the demurrer to the return and dismiss the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. Sewer Commission
853 A.2d 497 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2004)
Stephenson v. Common Council
181 N.W. 1001 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1921)
State ex rel. Davern v. Rose
122 N.W. 751 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1909)
State ex rel. Wagner v. Dahl
122 N.W. 748 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1909)
Anderson v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.
122 N.W. 794 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 N.W. 802, 134 Wis. 437, 1908 Wisc. LEXIS 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-vanderwall-v-mayor-of-phillips-wis-1908.