State ex rel. U-Brand Corp. v. Wood

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. U-Brand Corp. v. Wood

2001 Ohio 40, 91 Ohio St. 3d 377

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 25, 2001

Docket2000-1136

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 2001 Ohio 40 (State ex rel. U-Brand Corp. v. Wood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. U-Brand Corp. v. Wood, 2001 Ohio 40, 91 Ohio St. 3d 377 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 377.]

THE STATE EX REL. U-BRAND CORPORATION, INC., APPELLANT, v. WOOD ET AL., APPELLEES.

[Cite as State ex rel. U-Brand Corp. v. Wood, 2001-Ohio-40.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 00-1136—Submitted February 27, 2001—Decided April 25, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-425. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Scott, Scriven & Wahoff, L.L.P., Timothy E. Cowans and Richard Goldberg, for appellant. Stephen E. Mindzak; Donaldson Law Offices, L.P.A., and John D. Donaldson, for appellee Lloyd Wood. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Dennis L. Hufstader, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 377.]

THE STATE EX REL. U-BRAND CORPORATION, INC., APPELLANT, v. WOOD ET AL., APPELLEES.

[Cite as State ex rel. U-Brand Corp. v. Wood, 2001-Ohio-40.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 00-1136—Submitted February 27, 2001—Decided April 25, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-425. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Scott, Scriven & Wahoff, L.L.P., Timothy E. Cowans and Richard Goldberg, for appellant. Stephen E. Mindzak; Donaldson Law Offices, L.P.A., and John D. Donaldson, for appellee Lloyd Wood. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Dennis L. Hufstader, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2001 Ohio 40, 91 Ohio St. 3d 377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-u-brand-corp-v-wood-ohio-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack