State ex rel. U-Brand Corp. v. Wood

2001 Ohio 40, 91 Ohio St. 3d 377
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 25, 2001·No. 2000-1136·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 377.]

THE STATE EX REL. U-BRAND CORPORATION, INC., APPELLANT, v. WOOD ET AL., APPELLEES.

[Cite as State ex rel. U-Brand Corp. v. Wood, 2001-Ohio-40.]

Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed.

(No. 00-1136—Submitted February 27, 2001—Decided April 25, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-425.

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

Scott, Scriven & Wahoff, L.L.P., Timothy E. Cowans and Richard Goldberg, for appellant.

Stephen E. Mindzak; Donaldson Law Offices, L.P.A., and John D.

Donaldson, for appellee Lloyd Wood.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Dennis L. Hufstader, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. U-Brand Corp. v. Wood, 2001 Ohio 40, 91 Ohio St. 3d 377 (Ohio 2001).

2001 Ohio 40 (State ex rel. U-Brand Corp. v. Wood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Washington
2022 Ohio 1426 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2022)
State v. Wells
2022 Ohio 30 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2022)