State ex rel. Tyrrell v. Jay EM Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Tyrrell v. Jay EM Corp.

2000 Ohio 156, 89 Ohio St. 3d 275

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 12, 2000

Docket1999-2167

StatusPublished

This text of 2000 Ohio 156 (State ex rel. Tyrrell v. Jay EM Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Tyrrell v. Jay EM Corp., 2000 Ohio 156, 89 Ohio St. 3d 275 (Ohio 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 89 Ohio St.3d 275.]

THE STATE EX REL. TYRRELL, APPELLANT, v. JAY EM CORPORATION; INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Tyrrell v. Jay EM Corp., 2000-Ohio-156.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 99-2167—Submitted May 23, 2000—Decided July 12, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 98AP-1604. __________________ Shapiro, Kendis & Associates Co., L.P.A., and Rachel B. Jaffy, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Vincent T. Lombardo, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. RESNICK, J., dissents. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 89 Ohio St.3d 275.]

THE STATE EX REL. TYRRELL, APPELLANT, v. JAY EM CORPORATION; INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Tyrrell v. Jay EM Corp., 2000-Ohio-156.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 99-2167—Submitted May 23, 2000—Decided July 12, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 98AP-1604. __________________ Shapiro, Kendis & Associates Co., L.P.A., and Rachel B. Jaffy, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Vincent T. Lombardo, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. RESNICK, J., dissents. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2000 Ohio 156, 89 Ohio St. 3d 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-tyrrell-v-jay-em-corp-ohio-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack