State ex rel. Triplett v. Ross

848 N.E.2d 856, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1492
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 7, 2006
Docket2006-0742
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 848 N.E.2d 856 (State ex rel. Triplett v. Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Triplett v. Ross, 848 N.E.2d 856, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1492 (Ohio 2006).

Opinion

In Prohibition. On motion to dismiss, motion of Ohio Attorney General for leave to intervene as respondent, and answer of intervening respondent. Motion to intervene granted. Alternative writ granted, and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days; relator shall file his brief within 10 days of the filing of the evidence; respondents shall file their brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 7 days after the filing of respondents’ brief.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick and O’Connor, JJ., would grant the motion to intervene and the motion to dismiss.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Triplett v. Ross
855 N.E.2d 1174 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
848 N.E.2d 856, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-triplett-v-ross-ohio-2006.