State ex rel. Town of Woodland v. Board of Supervisors

36 N.W. 398, 70 Wis. 491, 1888 Wisc. LEXIS 83
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 31, 1888
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 36 N.W. 398 (State ex rel. Town of Woodland v. Board of Supervisors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Town of Woodland v. Board of Supervisors, 36 N.W. 398, 70 Wis. 491, 1888 Wisc. LEXIS 83 (Wis. 1888).

Opinion

Cole, O. J.

This case involves the same questions as those considered in State ex rel. Baraboo v. Sauk Co., ante, p. 485. The relation in this case is defective, as was the relation in that. The motion to quash must be granted, but with leave to the^relator to amend the relation and writ by supplying the necessary statement that the relator was authorized and directed by the voters of the town at a town [492]*492meeting to commence this proceeding. A reasonable time is allowed the relator to make the amendment.

By the Court.— Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Village of Bloomer v. Town of Bloomer
107 N.W. 974 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1906)
Battles v. Doll
89 N.W. 187 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1902)
State ex rel. Town of Spring Lake v. Board of Supervisors
37 N.W. 231 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 N.W. 398, 70 Wis. 491, 1888 Wisc. LEXIS 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-town-of-woodland-v-board-of-supervisors-wis-1888.