State ex rel. Tomasic v. Kansas City
This text of 698 P.2d 382 (State ex rel. Tomasic v. Kansas City) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
This is an original action in quo warranto brought by Nick A. Tomasic, Wyandotte County District Attorney, (relator) challenging the constitutionality of K.S.A. 79-201a Second, as amended, and challenging the legality of certain actions taken or proposed to be taken by the City of Kansas City, Kansas, and the City of Kansas City, Kansas-Wyandotte County Joint Port Authority (respondents) under an inducement agreement with General Motors Corporation (GM).
Due to the urgency of the matter and public interest involved, this action was given a preferential setting in our court. The case has been briefed thoroughly by the parties and was argued on April 2, 1985.
After examining the record and giving the matter due consideration we hold judgment shall be entered for the respondents. The court finds that K.S.A. 79-201a Second does not violate the Kansas Constitution or the United States Constitution in any of the particulars charged by the relator, and the challenged actions taken or proposed to be taken by the respondents are legal.
This brief opinion announcing the decision of the court will be [165]*165supplemented by a formal opinion to be filed when it is prepared.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
698 P.2d 382, 237 Kan. 164, 1985 Kan. LEXIS 467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-tomasic-v-kansas-city-kan-1985.