State ex rel. Thompson v. Indus. Comm.

1998 Ohio 250, 82 Ohio St. 3d 254

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 82 Ohio St.3d 254.]

THE STATE EX REL. THOMPSON, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Thompson v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-250.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 95-2315—Submitted May 12, 1998—Decided June 24, 1998.) APPEAL and CROSS-APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 94APD10-1580. __________________ Shapiro, Kendis & Assoc. Co., L.P.A., Rachel B. Jaffy and James D. Kendis, for appellee and cross-appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Sandra L. Nimrick, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant and cross-appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur. COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and deny the writ. COOK, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________