State ex rel. Thompson v. Indus. Comm.

1998 Ohio 35, 83 Ohio St. 3d 437
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Thompson v. Indus. Comm.. Read the opinion of the Court — 82 Ohio St. 3d 585
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 28, 1998·No. 1998-0075·Published

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 437.]

THE STATE EX REL. THOMPSON, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE, ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. Thompson v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-35.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 98-75—Submitted September 15, 1998—Decided October 28, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 96APD11-1566. __________________ Law Office of Thomas Tootle and Thomas Tootle, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Craigg E. Gould, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Thompson v. Indus. Comm., 1998 Ohio 35, 83 Ohio St. 3d 437 (Ohio 1998).

1998 Ohio 35 (State ex rel. Thompson v. Indus. Comm.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Thompson v. Industrial Commission
700 N.E.2d 595 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)