State ex rel. Taylor v. Leffler
724 N.E.2d 422, 88 Ohio St. 3d 178
Opinion
We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in its opinion. A writ of mandamus will not issue to compel an act already performed. State ex rel. Sharif v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 375, 376, 708 N.E.2d 718, 719. And appellees had no duty to create documents to meet Taylor’s requests. State ex rel. Warren v. Warner (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 432, 433, 704 N.E.2d 1228, 1229.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Taylor v. Leffler, 724 N.E.2d 422, 88 Ohio St. 3d 178 (Ohio 2000).
724 N.E.2d 422 (State ex rel. Taylor v. Leffler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State ex rel. Swingle v. Zaleski
2001 Ohio 288 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)
State ex rel. Taylor v. Leffler
2000 Ohio 289 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)