State ex rel. Stanton v. Zangerle

5 Ohio Law. Abs. 825
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Stanton v. Zangerle. Read the opinion of the Court — 117 Ohio St. 436
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 21, 1927·No. No. 10755, 20599·Published

Opinion

KINKADE, J.

The domicile of an Ohio corporotion, named in its charter, when located in Ohio, is the proper place for the listing of the corporation’s personal property for taxation, and the corporation is not required to list such property in any other tax district in Ohio by reason of the fact that it does a large portion of its business in such other district, except in cases where the Legislature, by statute, has plainly provided otherwise with respect to the listing and taxing of certain classes of corporate property. (Pelton v. Transp. Co., 37 Ohio St., 450 app. and fol.)

(Marshall, CJ., Day, Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Stanton v. Zangerle, 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 825 (Ohio 1927).

5 Ohio Law. Abs. 825 (State ex rel. Stanton v. Zangerle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.