State ex rel. Stanton v. Zangerle

5 Ohio Law. Abs. 825
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 21, 1927
DocketNo. 10755, 20599
StatusPublished

This text of 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 825 (State ex rel. Stanton v. Zangerle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Stanton v. Zangerle, 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 825 (Ohio 1927).

Opinion

KINKADE, J.

The domicile of an Ohio corporotion, named in its charter, when located in Ohio, is the proper place for the listing of the corporation’s personal property for taxation, and the corporation is not required to list such property in any other tax district in Ohio by reason of the fact that it does a large portion of its business in such other district, except in cases where the Legislature, by statute, has plainly provided otherwise with respect to the listing and taxing of certain classes of corporate property. (Pelton v. Transp. Co., 37 Ohio St., 450 app. and fol.)

(Marshall, CJ., Day, Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Ohio Law. Abs. 825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-stanton-v-zangerle-ohio-1927.