State ex rel. Spaulding v. Indus. Comm.
Opinion
[Cite as State ex rel. Spaulding v. Indus. Comm., 93 Ohio St.3d 653, 2001-Ohio-1893.]
THE STATE EX REL. SPAULDING, APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL.; KROGER COMPANY, APPELLANT. [Cite as State ex rel. Spaulding v. Indus. Comm. (2001), 93 Ohio St.3d 653.] Workers’ compensation — Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 01-817 — Submitted November 13, 2001 — Decided December 19, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-640. __________________ The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________ Robert A. Muehleisen, for appellee. Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur and Karl J. Sutter, for appellant. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2001 Ohio 1893 (State ex rel. Spaulding v. Indus. Comm.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.