State Ex Rel. Smith v. Clarke

610 N.E. 634, 117 Ohio St. 621, 117 Ohio St. (N.S.) 621, 1927 Ohio LEXIS 249
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 12, 1927·No. 20685·Published

Opinion

The alternative writ of mandamus prayed for herein is denied, for the reason that the grounds upon which said application is made have heretofore been decided by this Court in Causes Nos. 20119 and 20176. [Smith, a Taxpayer, v. City of Fremont, 115 Ohio St., 729, and State, ex rel. Smith, v. City of Fremont, 116 Ohio St., 469.] The cause is therefore dismissed.

Cause dismissed.

Day, Kinkade, Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Smith v. Clarke, 610 N.E. 634, 117 Ohio St. 621, 117 Ohio St. (N.S.) 621, 1927 Ohio LEXIS 249 (Ohio 1927).

610 N.E. 634 (State Ex Rel. Smith v. Clarke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. City of Fremont
156 N.E. 216 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1926)
State Ex Rel. Smith v. City of Fremont
157 N.E. 318 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1927)