Smith v. City of Fremont
156 N.E. 216, 115 Ohio St. 729, 115 Ohio St. (N.S.) 729, 4 Ohio Law. Abs. 786, 1926 Ohio LEXIS 251
Opinion
It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause, on the authority of Shryock, a Taxpayer, v. City of Zanesville, 92 Ohio St., 375, 110 N. E., 937, and Vansuch, Dir. of Public Safety & Service, v. State, ex rel. Fetch, 112 Ohio St., 688, 148 N. E., 232.
Petition in error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. City of Fremont, 156 N.E. 216, 115 Ohio St. 729, 115 Ohio St. (N.S.) 729, 4 Ohio Law. Abs. 786, 1926 Ohio LEXIS 251 (Ohio 1926).
156 N.E. 216 (Smith v. City of Fremont) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Ex Rel. Smith v. Clarke
610 N.E. 634 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1927)