State ex rel. Shemo v. City of Mayfield Heights

92 Ohio St. 3d 324

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 18, 2001·No. No. 01-929·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinions

On consideration of relators’ motion for expedited consideration of their motion for peremptory writ,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion for expedited consideration be, and hereby is, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that relators’ motion for peremptory writ be, and hereby is, denied, and that the cause be, and hereby is, dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with S.Ct.Prac.R. X(4)(B).

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., concurs separately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On consideration of relators’ motion for expedited consideration of their motion for peremptory writ,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion for expedited consideration be, and hereby is, granted.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., concurs separately.

State ex rel. Shemo v. City of Mayfield Heights, 92 Ohio St. 3d 324 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

92 Ohio St. 3d 324 (State ex rel. Shemo v. City of Mayfield Heights) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Goodpaster v. Banker

2016 Ohio 1077 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2016)

State ex rel. Evans v. Blackwell

857 N.E.2d 88 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)

State ex rel. Hackworth v. Hughes

776 N.E.2d 1050 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)

State ex rel. Sudlow v. Hancock County Board of Commissioners

93 Ohio St. 3d 1224 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)

State ex rel. Shemo v. City of Mayfield Heights

752 N.E.2d 854 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)

State ex rel. Shemo v. Mayfield Hts.

2001 Ohio 203 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)