State ex rel. Sudlow v. Hancock County Board of Commissioners
This text of 93 Ohio St. 3d 1224 (State ex rel. Sudlow v. Hancock County Board of Commissioners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
On Return to Regular Docket, S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination, respondent’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, relators’ motion to strike, and motion of JoAnn Reeds for leave to intervene. Upon consideration,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion of JoAnn Reeds for leave to intervene be, and hereby is, GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that relators’ remaining claims be dismissed without prejudice for failure to filé a complaint or petition and for faffing to [1225]*1225comply with S.Ct.Prac.R. X(4)(B). See, e.g., State ex rel. Bealler v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 36, 37, 740 N.E.2d 1100, 1102; State ex rel. Shemo v. Mayfield Hts. (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 324, 750 N.E.2d 167.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 Ohio St. 3d 1224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-sudlow-v-hancock-county-board-of-commissioners-ohio-2001.