State ex rel. Sudlow v. Hancock County Board of Commissioners

93 Ohio St. 3d 1224
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 14, 2001·No. No. 01-709·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

On Return to Regular Docket, S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination, respondent’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, relators’ motion to strike, and motion of JoAnn Reeds for leave to intervene. Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion of JoAnn Reeds for leave to intervene be, and hereby is, GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that relators’ remaining claims be dismissed without prejudice for failure to filé a complaint or petition and for faffing to [1225]*1225comply with S.Ct.Prac.R. X(4)(B). See, e.g., State ex rel. Bealler v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 36, 37, 740 N.E.2d 1100, 1102; State ex rel. Shemo v. Mayfield Hts. (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 324, 750 N.E.2d 167.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Douglas, F.E. Sweeney and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Sudlow v. Hancock County Board of Commissioners, 93 Ohio St. 3d 1224 (Ohio 2001).

93 Ohio St. 3d 1224 (State ex rel. Sudlow v. Hancock County Board of Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tunison v. Atty. Gen. of Ohio, Unpublished Decision (3-9-2004)
2004 Ohio 1062 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004)
State ex rel. Sudlow v. Hancock Cty. Bd. of Commrs.
2001 Ohio 1612 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)